 |
CAME THOMAS
A Novel in Thamizh by KA.NAA.SUBRAMANIAN
Translated
into English by Latha Ramakrishnan
1. Thiruvalluvar (Tamil: திருவள்ளுவர், Tiruvaḷḷuvar ?)was a
celebrated Tamil poet
and philosopher [1] whose contribution to Tamil literature is
the Thirukkural, a
work on ethics. Thiruvalluvar is thought to have lived sometime between
the 2nd century BC and the 8th century AD.This estimate is based on linguistic
analysis of his writings, as there is no archaeological evidence for when he
lived.He is sometimes also called Theiva Pulavar ("Divine
Poet"), Valluvar, Poyya mozhi Pulavar, Senna Pothar, or Gnana Vettiyan.
2. Thomas the Apostle, also called Doubting Thomas or Didymus (meaning
"Twin," as
does "Thomas" inAramaic") was one of the Twelve Apostles of Jesus. He is best known for questioning Jesus' resurrection
when first told of it, then proclaiming "My Lord and my God" on
seeing Jesus in John 20:28. He was perhaps the only
Apostle who went out side the Roman Empireto
preach the Gospel. He is also belie ved to have crossed the largest area, which
includes the Parthian Empire and India.
3. Ka. Naa. Subramanyam (b.
31 January 1912 - d. 18 Dec ember 1988)[1] was a Tamil writer and critic from Tamil Nadu, India. He is also popularly known by his Tamil initials
as Ka..Naa.Su. Subramaniam was born in Valangaiman in Thanjavur District.
His first noted published work was the novel Poithevu (1946).
He also wrote poems using the pseu donym Mayan. He published many
literary journals like Ilakkiya vattam, Sooravali and Chandraodayam.
He became a literary critic in the 1950s. His reviews first appeared in the
magazines Swadesamitran and Saraswathi. In 1965,
he moved to New Delhi and
started writing articles for English language newspapers. For the next twenty
years he lived in Delhi
[*courtesy: wikipedia]
I] down memory lane….
ON TRANSLATING KA.NAA.SU’S NOVEL THOMAS VANDHAAR
INTO ENGLISH, UNDER THE TITLE
I am never good at undertaking ‘down memory
lane’ journeys. And, twenty years is a long time. Still, a few reminiscences
about this book seem inevitable…
I] down memory lane….
ON TRANSLATING KA.NAA.SU’S NOVEL THOMAS VANDHAAR
INTO ENGLISH, UNDER THE TITLE
_‘CAME
THOMAS’
latha ramakrishnan
Two or three years before his demise, in
December 1988, veteran writer Ka.Naa.Subramaniam had come to Chennai and was
living in Mylapore, with a failing eye-sight. Learning this I wrote a card to
him saying that I would consider it an honour to be of some help to his
literary activities. Shortly afterwards I met him and started going to his
place almost everyday. I was one of the few who could read his handwriting (it
would be too small but so neatly aligned with no corrections, addition,
deletion etc.) and so was able to be of some help to him. I could feel a sense
of peace in his presence.
When he asked me to translate into Tamil his
novel ‘Avadhuthar’, originally written in English by him I thought he was kind
of evaluating my literary capabilities and nothing more than that. But, he did
get my translation published. So, when he asked me to translate his poignant
novel ‘Thomas Vandhaar’ into English I set out to do it in right earnest.
Sad indeed that when I was half way through the
translation assignment, Ka.Naa.Su breathed his last. Nevertheless, I finished
translating Thomas Vandhaar, giving it the title ‘Came Thomas’, in the next six
months. And, when his wife left for Delhi I
gave my typed manuscript to her, thinking that in Delhi
Nothing happened in the next twenty years for
which no use blaming any body, including my own self. Recently, when I came to
know that writer Ka.Naa.Su’s books and works were handed over to Kalachuvadu
for preser vation, I contacted the son-in-law of Ka.Naa.Su, Mr.A.R.Venkatachalapathy
and the head office of Kalachuvadu in Nagarcoil asking for my manuscript. They
made arrangements for the manuscript to reach me within a month for which I
genuinely thank them.
Seeing my manuscript, the white-sheets having
turned grey and brown, after almost two decades, with the covering letter
written by me, in fact, I experie nced an eerie feeling, to say the least.
We can perceive a general trend around us, the ‘in-thing’
so to say, whereby if one echoes our views he/she is hailed and approved of,
and, if not, abused and subjected to class-based and caste-based castigation.
But, Ka.Naa.Su belonged to that clan of writers who write what they feel right
no matter whether they get accolades or brickbats and who would never be the mouth-piece
of any particular individual or group.
When this novel was serialized in a small
magazine for several months it gave considerable food for thought. I sincerely
hope that this English version of it would also prove that poignant. Whatever
be the merits of this translation of mine, they truly belong to Ka.Naa.Su and
the lapses are entirely mine. Hope they are few.
There are a round 25 chapters in this novel,
comprising some 230 pages. I would be uploading my English rendering of this
novel chapterwise in this blogspot of mine once in every week. I sincerely wish
to have my English rendering of this very thought-provoking novel published in
a book form. I sincerely hope that there won't be any need for me to remind
anyone that though writer Ka.Na.Su's works are nationalized my English
translation of his Thamizh novel 'Thomas Vandhaar[Came Thomas] is not!
Regards,
Latha ramakrishnan
Chapter 1
Can
anyone claim for sure that Thiruvalluvar lived thousand and nine hundred years
ago or thirty, fifty or hundred years earlier or later only, from hence?
How
can anyone say with absolute certainty? Apart from the fact that there lived a
man called Thiruvalluvar and he wrote Thirukural, the rest like when and where
he lived, which religion he belonged to , what educational qualifications he
possessed are things not known to us clearly, we should admit.
Still,
stories afloat such as Thiruvalluvar Year, that he lived in Mylapore, had a
virtuous woman by name Vasuki as his wife… All these are…?
Should
be mere tales only. It is man’s tact to fill in those gaps when nothing is
known for sure, as suits his whims and fancies. There is nothing wrong in it.
Of
course, nothing wrong. But, will that become true?
What
at all is Truth? Usually, we accept things if we feel that accepting that which
is accepted by one and all would be good to us as well as to others and also to
the society.
Don’t
we tend to think on the line that accepting stories in the place of History has
been the Indian Custom?
But,
History, Fiction, Mythology, Novel are all, in a way, the Truth that all have
accepted for convenience sake. Aren’t they? Instead of saying that this was ‘The
Truth’ I came here to ask whether it was a lie. But, I changed course.
Isn’t believing History as nothing but facts and accepting it in stories,
Mythology too, just a Custom?
Viewed
in that light we can accept that more or less thousand and nine hundred years
ago form hence – it can be fifty or hundred years earlier or later too – in a
place called Mylapore, lived a man called Thiruvalluvar. When nothing is known
as to whereelse and in what other period he lived, what is wrong in accepting
the available information regarding the time and place of his being? We can say
with conviction that though not exactly known it looks like it might have been
so _
The
nativity of Thiruvalluvar and the period in which he lived are not known. Does
one know at least the religion to which
he belonged…?
Even
that is not to be. Hindus, Saivas, Vaishnavaites and many other sects and also
Jains, why – even the extremists claim him to be of their clan. But, by and
large, there is more room to consider him a Jain.
How?
From
things like such terms as that appear in the very first Kural ‘Aadhi
Bhagavan’ [the Prime God] and ‘Malarmisai Aeginaan’[He who is atop
the floral seat]. Vaiyapuri Pillai and others consider him a Jain. Seems like,
we can also consider him so, thus.
Will
that alone suffice?
Ofcourse
not. Taking into account the prestigious place to which Justice is raised aloft
and also the atmosphere of non-violence in the Universe of Thiruvalluvar also,
we can consider him to have been a Jain. In one Kural he says that as long as
there remain men who eat the flesh of the killed animals, there will exist the
practice of killing animals. This was an argument of the Jains in those times
to checkmate to the Buddhists. Likewise, it is very clear that he regarded
Agriculture in the same vain as like the Jains who considered it holy, high and
noble. Having come to agree that he did not belong to the religion of Buddha,
taking into account the fact that he had dealt with at length many thoughts
common to both the Schools – the Boutha and the Jaina also ,
there is room enough to think of him as a Jain.
What
about the practice of describing Thiruvalluvar as a ‘so-called’ low-caste born,
which is in vogue?
Isn’t
there room to speak of him as a ‘low-caste’ born, even if he was a Jain?
It
is believed that he belonged to the ‘Valluvar’ caste. The reason for such a
notion is not known.
In
his work one can find several views and sayings of Christianity. Which gives
room to consider him a Christian. After Rev.G.U.Pope voced his opinion that he
was to be viewed at least as a person who was familiar with the views and
ideology of Christianity, such a viewpoint has come to stay.
That Jesus himself had engaged his immediate,
chosen disciples in the mission of converting the whole humanity as Christians,
holds the history of Christianity. It is said that according to the Bible the
task of converting the Indians as Christians was assigned to one called
St.Thomas. I don’t know with what evidence they claim so. And, the eleven disciples of Jesus known as Apostles divided
the world between themselves and toiled hard to spread the gospel of Jesus
throughout the world. This seems to be a
veritable historical fact.
Then,
would he, called St.Thomas who was one of the eleven, who came to India
Who
can say that such a thing should not,
could not have taken place? We can think on the line as to whether it could
have happened. On the other hand, one can also say that some of the noble
Christian concepts of life would have become known to Thiruvalluvar from
within. None can say for sure that they couldn’t have been taken shape like
that, from his own inner light.
Then,
what are the possibilities of a meeting between Thiruvalluvar and St.Thomas?
For, don’t we need some proof to believe…?
True,
we do. There exists an age-old story, age-old and widespread among the
Christians, which says that the disciple of Jesus called Apostle Thomas came to
India for the first time during 40 B.C. and propagated Christianity in the
North-West region of India, with the support of King Kondaberns and, either after his death of
dethronement , went away from the place for want of help and support, and, for
some time worked in Kerala, and, somewhere around 50 B.C., a little earlier or
later, initiating the fishermen into Christian ideals, he went along with them
in their boat and along the eastern coast of Indian Ocean reached the seashore
of Mylapore during 52, 54, 55 B.C., most probably 62, 63 B.C., was killed by a
Brahmin, and attained the status of a martyr.
One
set of people might tend to ask whether a Brahmin could have killed him.
The
opposite section, in keeping with today’s trend might say that a Brahmin alone
could have murdered as the rest have come and journey through the Path of Love
and Brotherhood. Don’t know whether the story is real or not. But, St.Thomas
Mount, St. Thomas
Thus,
if St.Thomas had indeed come to Mylapore, Thiruvalluvar might have had the
opportunity of listening to his religious-speeches; gospels.
Of
course, he would have listened to the speeches of St.Thomas that were spreading
Christianity. Because, for those like St.Thomas who had belief in conversion,
only those among the Hindus who were considered ‘low-caste’ born could be won over. Several wealthy and
powerful men might have also lent ears to his speeches. These men would have
been slightly indifferent and angry toward the approaches and style of and
functioning of their own religion. But, indeed Thiruvalluvar, who was in a way
a saint and a seer, must have lived in pride and glory during his period, in
the then prevailing social atmosphere. And, would such a person have gone to
meet St.Thomas?
Then,
how could there have been a meeting between the two?
Before
proceeding on that line we should think of another aspect. We do not know for
sure whether Thiruvalluvar was a Jain or not. We can only say that there is
scope to view him as one. He was one who tried to preach to the world through
his work, something beyond the mere Jain concepts of Life, Humaneness and a set
of ideals would be acceptable to one and all. If the Apostle who was trying
hard to make the world accept the thoughts and ideals of Christianity would
have met such a person there is room to think that he would have tried to steer
him toward Christianity.
Indeed,
it is funny to contemplate so. If both of them had indulged in converting each
other to their respective religions who would have succeeded? And, we feel that
one who won or lost is not what is important, but the meeting and its
consequences.
Both
of them were men of great mental strength and will-power. St.Thomas was one who
came to India
Ok.
But, how and under what circumstances both of them would have been thrown together?
Someone
called Vaadhoolan in his capacity of an associate of Valluvar, is
telling about the historic meet between the two learned men and their dialogues
and association. Shall we listen?
Who
is this Vaadhoolan?
Someone.
Someone like you and me. After some thousand years who would believe that You
and I did exist? He is someone like us. He is required to narrate this story.
Isn’t
it that through him the story should take place in our perception only? But,
what is wrong in that? The perception of the narrator is one; that of the
reader, listener, viewer is yet another one and the fusion of the two which
gives rise to a wholesome perception. All indeed all of these, have a place in
this. Don’t they?
Shouldn’t
we know something about Vaadhoolan?
He
himself will tell- Let’s listen.
Are
we to believe this too? Everything should be believed. Isn’t it a known fact
that, in this vast world there are very many things which we refuse to believe,
but are bound to believe.
0
No comments:
Post a Comment